Oleks
88fc58b2fd
ci/woodpecker/push/test Pipeline was successful
The stability gate treated every evidence flip as symmetric, and that produced a false downgrade on the candidate it was written for (kotkan/claude-plugin-inference-arbitrage#15). Re-measuring anxious/agent-wip/release-policy-derivation over four real windows with the same script gave 0 -> 2 -> 12 -> 15 invocations at 7/14/27/60 days: monotonic accumulation of a step that runs about once every two days, not a label flipping about. The 7-day window had not caught an unstable candidate, it had failed to observe a real one. So a thin/unmeasured reading now only overturns a `measured` one when its window is at least 90% as wide (observed since->until span). Below that the comparison takes a third verdict, `insufficient-window`: not filed, not downgraded to a boundary question, no FR-6.5 self-report, and carried forward with the wider snapshot left as the standing comparison point. The parity is relative rather than an absolute day count because the adequate width is a property of the candidate's invocation rate, which the auditor does not know in advance. Unchanged, and tested: the reverse direction (thin prior -> measured now) still downgrades, a flip between comparably wide windows still downgrades, and a threshold crossing with `measured` on both sides is never excused by narrowness. An unreadable window is not an exemption either — the flip stands and window_parity records that the check could not run. - bin/stability-classify: window_days/window_parity/deferrable, the insufficient-window verdict, stability_deferrals, window_parity on findings too, insufficient_window + window_parity_ratio in the gate block - bin/audit-snapshot: record deferrals in the snapshot notes so the row is visible on the wiki page instead of silently dropped - design/spec.md: FR-4.5.1 as a testable requirement; S4 restated - design/rubric.md: the third boundary in §5b - skills/offload-audit/SKILL.md: do not file and do not self-report a deferral - tests: real 60-day anxious fixture; cases (f)/(f2) on real data, (j)-(n) synthetic — 7 test files pass Verified against the live store (~/.cache/inference-arbitrage/wiki): the real 7.0d-vs-26.49d comparison now reports insufficient-window with zero findings, while the real 33.4d-vs-26.49d one reports stable at 13.87% and files normally.